HR 3424referred119th Congress

SPACE Act of 2025

Introduced May 15, 2025House billPolicy area: Government Operations and PoliticsLast action Sep 9, 2025Sponsor: Robert F. Onder, Jr.(R-MO)

governmentGovernment Operations and Politics

Environment and Public Works CommitteeTransportation and Infrastructure CommitteeEconomic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management Subcommittee

Ask about this Build timeline Compare Export source pack

Official Congress record Open in Network Lab Trace connections

Official summaryUpdated Sep 9, 2025

What the bill does

Shared Property Agency Collaboration and Engagement Act of 2025 or the SPACE Act of 2025 This bill directs the General Services Administration (GSA) to collaborate with federal agencies regarding the use of shared-space arrangements in federally leased buildings. The GSA must (1) collaborate with tenants of federally leased space to better identify concerns around shared-space arrangements; (2) develop criteria that would facilitate the expanded use of space sharing; (3) identify how special-use space can be used to improve space sharing; and (4) establish measurable objectives, in consultation with tenants, to quantify the success of shared-space arrangements among federal agencies. GSA must brief Congress on implementation of the bill within six months after the bill's enactment.

Latest official action

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

Lobbying Filings

$416.0M

Total Lobbying Spend

Suspicious Trades

Members Involved

Timeline

Jul 22, 2024lobbying

Lobbying filed by NATURE CONSERVANCY

Jul 22, 2024lobbying

Lobbying filed by NATIONAL ALLIANCE OF FOREST OWNERS

Oct 21, 2024lobbying

Lobbying filed by NATURE CONSERVANCY

Jan 21, 2025lobbying

Lobbying filed by NATURE CONSERVANCY

Jan 21, 2025lobbying

Lobbying filed by NATIONAL ALLIANCE OF FOREST OWNERS

Apr 8, 2025trade

Official Congressional Actions

Sep 9, 2025IntroReferral

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

Environment and Public Works Committee

View official action

Sep 8, 2025Floor

Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 397 - 1 (Roll no. 240). (text: CR H3876: 1)

View official action

Sep 8, 2025Floor

Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3880-3881)

View official action

Sep 8, 2025Floor

At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.

Lobbying Activity

Registrant	Client	Amount	Filed	Period	Issues
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY	NATURE CONSERVANCY	$83.0M	Jul 22, 2024	2024Q2	AGRBUDCAW
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY	NATURE CONSERVANCY	$60.0M	Jan 21, 2025	2024Q4	AGRENGBUD
NATIONAL ALLIANCE OF FOREST OWNERS

Suspicious Trading Activity

Congress members who traded stocks in companies connected to lobbying on this bill, within 90 days of its introduction date.

Member	Party	Ticker	Company	Trade	Date	Amount	Timing	Lobbying Client	Conflict
Gilbert Ray Cisneros, Jr.	D	K	K	Buy	Apr 29, 2025	$1,001 - $15,000	16d before	BACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS & ANGLERS	36%
Robert P. Bresnahan, Jr.	R

Conflict Summary

4 trades by 2 members of Congress in companies connected to lobbying on HR 3424. The average conflict score is 29%.

Gilbert Ray Cisneros, Jr. (3 trades)Robert P. Bresnahan, Jr. (1 trade)

Votes on This Bill

Member	Party	Position	Date
Robert B. Aderholt	R	yea	Sep 8, 2025
Jake Auchincloss	D	yea	Sep 8, 2025
Mark E. Amodei	R	yea	Sep 8, 2025
Alma S. Adams	D	yea	Sep 8, 2025

Methodology: Bill-Lobbying-Trade Connection

CapitolExposed identifies the "bill-lobbying-trade pipeline" by: (1) finding lobbying filings (LD-2) that specifically mention this bill, (2) matching lobbying clients to publicly traded companies, and (3) finding stock trades by members of Congress in those companies within 90 days of the bill's introduction date. Trades made before the bill was introduced are highlighted in red, as they may indicate advance knowledge. This analysis surfaces correlations worthy of scrutiny; it does not prove wrongdoing.